The Local Area Development Scheme for Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA-LAD) has unveiled a striking paradox in governance: an alarming amount of allocated funds lying idle while certain constituencies overstep their financial boundaries. According to data, roughly Rs 150 crore from a total Rs 300 crore allocation in 3 years remains unutilised, starkly highlighting both the disengagement of some legislators towards their responsibilities and the fiscal imprudence of those who have found ways around constraints. Such discrepancies not only question the scheme's efficacy but also indicate a pressing need for introspection and reform.
The MLA-LAD scheme was initiated with high aspirations to empower elected representatives to enact meaningful development and change within their constituencies. Designed to facilitate the sanctioning of projects worth up to Rs 2.5 crore annually, the ultimate goal is to enhance public amenities and infrastructure in sectors like drinking water, education, public health, sanitation, and roads. However, the fact that nearly half the allocation remains unused over the past three years raises concerns about the accountability of MLAs and the potential inefficiencies in the bureaucratic processes surrounding the scheme.
The data reveals a stark contrast in the performance of specific constituencies. While constituencies like Sanvordem, Cuncolim, Sanguem, and others have effectively utilized their total allocations, showcasing a commendable level of engagement and responsibility, others like Vasco and Dabolim have shockingly failed to submit a single proposal. This lack of action reflects an apathy towards developmental needs and highlights a failure to engage with the very electorate that entrusted these representatives with their mandates. Moreover, this cuts out a sorry figure of legislators against the backdrop of the State boasting of speedy development.
Interestingly, four legislators have not only maximized their project allocations but have ventured further by spending over Rs 4.25 crore beyond their prescribed limits. While it may appear to demonstrate initiative, their actions have overstepped the financial frameworks and are an inclination to prioritize immediate results over long-term sustainability. Moreover, their excess spending will now be adjusted against future allocations, bringing into question their management and planning skills.
With the current operational guidelines limiting fresh project proposals until existing ceilings are adhered to, the onus lies squarely on the shoulders of the legislators. The state government’s adherence to this policy is critical to restore integrity within the framework. The realities of public service necessitate a deeper engagement and understanding of the citizens' pressing needs, instead of treating fund allotments as mere numbers on a spreadsheet.
Development has been synonymous with politics, especially in Goa. Politicians use the development plank all the time to achieve goals, whether it is switching parties or aligning with groups. As constituents, it is paramount for citizens to seek transparency and accountability from their elected representatives. They have a right to question this failure to deliver. The success of the MLA-LAD scheme stands not just on the numbers spent, but on the real, tangible improvements those funds facilitate in the communities they serve. Policymakers must also consider comprehensive evaluations of such schemes to ensure they serve their intended purpose rather than becoming an avenue for mismanagement and complacency. The citizens deserve to see their representatives fighting for their welfare, rather than witnessing funds vanish into the abyss of bureaucratic indifference. We need responsible governance, reform, and engagement to uphold the true objective of the MLA-LAD scheme.
