The Central government’s ambitious plan to develop a river cruise circuit along the River Sal in Goa, along with the construction of three floating jetties, appears to be a bold leap into the realm of cruise tourism. However, behind the glossy façade of tourism promotion lies a complex web of local implications and unresolved concerns on whether the State is ready for such a transformation, more specifically whether River Sal is ready, and whether the stakeholders including fishermen who eke out a living here are prepared to welcome this development.
River Sal, which prides itself on its picturesque surroundings along South Goa, has long been a vital source of sustenance and livelihood for traditional fishermen. The very mention of cruise tourism in these waters would trigger alarm among local stakeholders because it would mean the end of the road for them. Fishing communities from villages such as Chinchinim, Assolna, and Velim rely heavily on the river’s rich marine resources. Local fishermen express apprehension that the burgeoning cruise sector will disrupt their way of life.
Furthermore, while the floating jetties may be seen as a gateway to tourist attractions like the Betul Fort and Betul Lighthouse, it raises environmental concerns. Local fishermen are worried that increased traffic will disturb the fragile marine habitat, which is already strained under the weight of existing fishing activities. The sedimentation caused by vessels could further threaten marine life, compromising the delicate balance maintained for generations.
The question is whether rigorous evaluations and impact assessment studies have been done on River Sal and whether the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) has conducted a proper carrying capacity assessment of the river. If State government authorities are clueless about the development, one wonders how the Centre picked River Sal for a circuit.
Moreover, the lack of consultation with local bodies and residents raises questions about the government’s commitment to inclusive governance which has been so frequently spoken about. Unfortunately, there has been suspense over the project and local bodies and the people in the area are completely in the dark. Sarpanchas from Cavelossim and Velim have lamented their ignorance of the plans for floating jetties and the broader cruise circuit. The disconnect between people and development reveals scant regard for stakeholders.
Goa’s rivers have their own charm and these are landmarks that define the State. Cruise tourism could draw tourists and stimulate economic growth, but there are consequences because this experiment could inadvertently mess up the local culture and the very spirit that defines Goa. The sights and sounds of traditional fishermen at work, the vibrant markets filled with locally caught seafood, and the true essence of Goan culture are at risk of being overshadowed by the push for cruise tourism, which prioritizes economic gains over community well-being.
Goa needs tourism because it is the backbone of the State’s economy for now. Cruise tourism may attract visitors because it offers a glimpse of the unexplored, however, it should not come at the cost of local livelihoods and marine ecosystems. The government must engage authentically with local communities, ensuring their involvement and assuaging fears before embarking on developments that will irrevocably alter their landscape.
We must prioritise sustainable practices to honour Goa’s rich cultural heritage and respect the people of the land. Without this, the promise of cruise tourism risks becoming a mirage, leaving only waves of discontent in its wake.
