The recent police directive to close shacks along the Candolim-Calangute-Baga coastal stretch by 11 pm, as stipulated in the Shack Policy, has ignited a storm of discontent among shack operators. Some of these businesses hold excise licenses permitting them to operate until 1 am, while many have been reported to remain open until the early hours of the morning in keeping with the high demand from tourists. This situation begs a broader examination of Goa's tourism policy, which needs to balance economic benefits and the preservation of local culture.
The operators defending extended hours cite the reality of their business model, arguing that budget travellers, who flock to Goa for its reputation as a destination for wine, dining, and nightlife, tend to patronise shacks for late-night entertainment. This self-reinforcing cycle of late-night visitors and continued operations raises questions about the kind of tourism that Goa wants to attract. As one operator noted, “These same individuals wouldn’t dare drink past 11 pm or litter in places like Singapore,” pointing toward a pressing need for both systemic change and strategic tourism marketing.
However, not all shack owners share the exuberance for extended hours, and the contrast is as clear as daylight. Operators in Candolim reported a distinct decline in business as the night progressed, with many establishments closing their doors well before the mandated deadline. Some maintain that the government must decide on how it wants to shape tourism. This division among shack operators not only highlights differing business models but also illustrates a rift within Goa’s economic strategy.
It’s important to recognize that while some shack operators are pushing back against the law in pursuit of profit, the prevailing discontent from local residents provides another vital counterpoint. Community members have expressed concern that the reckless indulgence of "low-quality tourists" has detrimental effects—both in terms of safety and the erosion of cultural values. Calls for a crackdown have arisen, with residents arguing that extended licenses should apply strictly to establishments with modern infrastructure, akin to five-star resorts. Local criticism also centres around the perceived transformation of beach shacks from humble eateries into vibrant nightclubs, with extended sunbeds and loud music increasingly dominating the shoreline.
The question is whether we should be worried about business, or the safety and security of people and tourists. What is our priority? It goes without saying that the late parties have been triggers for conflicts and assaults, and the two recent cases amplify the point. Shacks do not have mechanisms to troubleshoot rowdy visitors, and in the absence of adequate security, the chances are high that an argument could spiral into a full-fledged and uncontrollable assault. Goa needs a tailored approach to tourism management, one that accounts for local culture, safety, and the environmental impact of commercialization.
The broader issue is how to promote tourism without compromising the essence of what makes Goa unique. Stricter enforcement of regulations may not only help curb unruly tourist behaviour but also protect the local culture that residents cherish. Plus, it does not make sense if we have a policy and do not enforce it. If the government tries to shift goalposts in the name of tourism, Goa could be headed towards disaster.
It is time for policymakers to engage in a serious discussion about the future of Goa’s tourism. We need to look at the larger picture and prioritise community welfare — whether it is shutting establishments or clamping down on sound pollution. The crucial part is being sincere and consistent while dealing with violations.
