Locals claim selective targeting as century-old homes receive notices
Some ‘illegal’ structures including residential houses along the main Saligao-Mapusa road were recently served notices by the local panchayat.
Photo Credits: The Goan
MAPUSA
In a move that has stirred controversy and raised questions of political bias, the Saligao panchayat's recent issuance of notices to alleged illegal roadside structures has drawn criticism from several residents who claim selective targeting.
While local authorities cite a High Court directive to crack down on unauthorised construction, allegations have surfaced that the panchayat is disproportionately targeting individuals politically opposed to the ruling establishment.
Multiple residents claim that while some structures have been flagged for lacking proper permissions, others – allegedly linked to the ruling dispensation – have been spared.
One such resident, Avito Carvalho, who owns nearly a century-old house along the Saligao-Mapusa road, received a notice on April 24 demanding documentation within three days.
“My house is over 100 years old and is purely residential. I fail to understand how it suddenly became an illegal structure,” said Carvalho, who believes the notice is politically motivated.
Former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and social activist Pradeep Padgaonkar also received a similar notice.
“This is my ancestral house, which has stood for over 150 years. To call it illegal is offensive,” he said.
However, unlike others, Padgaonkar expressed belief that the notices have been issued uniformly.
Residents allege that the panchayat has deliberately targeted individuals perceived to be unsupportive of the ruling dispensation.
“While notices have been served to us, many illegal structures owned by BJP karyakartas have been left untouched. This is nothing short of selective harassment,” a resident said on the condition of anonymity.
Saligao Sarpanch Lucas Remedios has denied any bias, asserting that notices are being sent without any political consideration.
“We are only following the High Court’s order. There is no favouritism involved. Notices are being issued in phases and more will be sent out soon,” said Remedios.
In an apparent attempt to counter the allegations, he directed a panchayat staff member, in presence of this reporter, to expedite the issuance of pending notices.
“This is misinformation. Notices will be sent to all identified structures,” Remedios added, appearing visibly agitated by the backlash.
Despite assurances from the sarpanch, residents remain sceptical.
Efforts to reach local MLA Kedar Naik were unsuccessful, as he remained unavailable and did not respond to calls or text messages.
While the court’s directive aims to ensure lawful development, concerns remain that enforcement is being used as a tool for political retribution, especially against those who voice dissent against the ruling establishment.
As the situation unfolds, calls for transparency and uniform action grow louder, with residents demanding a fair and impartial approach to implementing the court’s order.
