MAPUSA
The State government received both praise and criticism for its recent decision to introduce an ordinance exempting temporary structures like shacks from the requirement of obtaining construction licenses.
While shack owners have largely welcomed the move, local residents have criticised it as regressive, fearing it may provide a loophole for those flouting the laws.
Critics argue that the decision could embolden individuals engaging in illegal activities without regard for legal norms.
Anjuna resident Sagardeep Sirsaikar highlighted discrepancies in the construction of shacks, noting that influential businessmen often use materials like concrete instead of the mandated wood material.
“Interested parties misuse the NOC of beach shack policy issued by the tourism department to construct shacks/temporary structures,” Sirsaikar said.
He suggested that the ordinance might be aimed at protecting such structures, which have come under scrutiny from the High Court.
Echoing similar sentiments, Trevor Mascarenhas raised concerns about the definition of "temporary structures," pointing out instances where supposedly temporary setups have transformed into lavish establishments with substantial investments in amenities like generators.
“Some of the temporary structures/shacks have posh setup with all the amenities. They spend crores to build the structure,” Mascarenhas said.
He further emphasised the need for clarity on what constitutes a temporary structure.
Desmond D'Costa of Assagao contested the ordinance, stressing the importance of obtaining construction licenses, particularly for structures built using materials like steel and concrete. He emphasised the necessity of adhering to regulatory procedures to ensure safety and compliance with standards.
In contrast, Cruz Cardozo, President of the Shack Owners Welfare Society, cautiously welcomed the ordinance, provided it is applied uniformly without discrimination among shack owners.
He expressed concerns about potential misuse of the ordinance and urged authorities to ensure fair implementation.
“If it’s applicable for beach shacks and benefits the Goans then we welcome it,” Cardozo said.
President of the Goan Traditional Shack Owners Association, Manuel Cardozo, supported the decision, asserting that it primarily benefits private shack owners.
He clarified that beach shacks are already exempt from construction licenses, thereby welcoming the ordinance as beneficial for private landowners.
The State government recently approved the promulgation of the ordinance, exempting all temporary structures from obtaining construction licenses from the Town and Country Planning (TCP) and panchayat. However, the decision has ignited a debate among stakeholders regarding its implications and implementation.
As opinions diverge on the matter, there remains a pressing need for clarity and consensus-building to address concerns surrounding coastal development, regulatory oversight, and environmental sustainability in Goa.
